Can NYC’s Underground Park get off the Ground?

There’s no denying that the High Line has had a huge economic impact on the areas of Chelsea it runs through. That isn’t always a good thing, argue some, but the fallout from increasing property value and migrating consumers does nothing to change the facts: 12,000 jobs created – 8,000 of which were in construction – $2 billion in private investment in areas surrounding the park, and apartment costs doubling per square foot all mark the project as a success. The investment from the city, from New York State, from the Federal Government, and from the main source – around $150 million dollars in private fundraising through Friends of the High Line – has, in a purely fiscal sense, been worth it.

The Lowline

What then of the mooted Lowline, the brainchild of Dan Barasch and James Ramsey? As the High Line is to the old elevated railway, so The Lowline aims to be to a long disused streetcar terminal in Williamsburg – a subterranean, rather than elevated, park, complete with “remote sunlight,” access to the nearby JMZ subway lines, and trees and flowers enough to satisfy any park goer. Excitingly futuristic and in many ways an obvious step for urban park design, this innovative idea is a natural progression for New York City – in a place that is already built up quite a bit, why not start building down? It is argued that The Lowline has the potential to offer viable public space while supporting and improving the neighborhood and neighboring businesses at the same time. It’s an ambitious plan, for sure. The Lowline would see the Trolley Terminal filled with trees, plants, and sunlight piped in through remote skylights and optical systems, but the cost requires city and state backing – as the High Line achieved – if it’s to become a reality. The focus at the moment is on building public and community support to raise money. Through September 2012 a special exhibition, Imagining The Lowline, gave people the chance to sample a portion of the project, complete with piped in sunlight (developed by Raad Studio) and the sound of unseen cars. Local councilman Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver has shown his support, and community interest is certainly growing. The key to The Lowline may lie in drawing parallels with the High Line’s economic precedent.

The High Line’s Fight for Viability

“The High Line plunges visitors into the very heart of a dense urban environment.”

When the High Line project was first suggested a decade ago, its future was not bright. The administration of Mayor Giuliani was against it, with the viaduct slated for demolition. Property owners were in favor of the razing of what was, back then, a derelict and unused space. Local business were fearful that the creation of the park would damage trade and hurt communities, and many doubted the economic benefits of a raised park that would be, in places, no wider than some of the city’s sidewalks. However those fighting for The High Line’s creation didn’t give up, and in 2003 an open competition was held inviting entries to design the future High Line, with a simple challenge: To create compelling visions for a new urban public space, with captivating designs that demonstrate how the line can be transformed in bold, optimistic ways to benefit New York City for generations.The competition – billed as one for “ideas” instead of concrete plans – sought to build upon the initial Friends of the High Line momentum and present answers to legal, social, and design issues that came from such a renovation project. 720 entrants from 36 countries presented visions and possibilities, and the winners have helped guide the ongoing development process.Now, the original doubts about the park have been blown from the water and Mayor Bloomberg has become a vocal supporter of the park, promoting investment and defending the rezoning and development of the surrounding area. As Bloomberg said, “The High Line plunges visitors into the very heart of a dense urban environment […] it also reclaims an artifact of the City’s recent industrial past, and reinvents it for the 21st century.” Now, businesses are keener to be near to the park than ever before.

Good News for The Lowline?

Can The Lowline reasonably expect similar success? The scope of economic impact would naturally be limited: the proposed site, the Williamsburg Trolley Terminal, beneath Delancey and Essex Streets, is roughly 1.5 acres, but – crucially – it is underground. The economic benefits brought by the High Line were in part due to the ability for businesses to move close to the park and, after the rezoning of the area in 2005, allowed residential properties and art galleries to flourish. The Lowline, though it would undoubtedly attract tourism and pedestrian traffic, faces limited development potential above ground as the site is already home to a busy roadway.

Barasch and Ramsey have turned attention to the benefits they say the Lowline could bring to the Seward Park Urban Renewal Area (SPURA) planned for the above ground areas near the proposed site. A draft economic impact survey suggests increased land values for SPURA sites of between $10 million and $20 million – with somewhere between $5 million and $10 million in hotel and real-estate taxes, along with sales, over 30 years based on a net-present-value basis. Strong arguments indeed, if they can supply the grass roots and community support required for such an ambitious project.The High Line is, by its nature set to expand despite the high cost of maintaining the site – currently estimated to be $3.5 – $4.5 million per year. Phase 2 construction is complete and due to open spring 2013, at a cost of $66.8 million, and as the popularity of the park grows and it brings tourism, investment – perhaps gentrification – and new business interests, it seems surprising that there was ever doubt the project would succeed at all. $38.4 million of phase 2 funds came from the city. The rest, and all maintenance costs, are provided through private donation.In contrast, The Lowline’s physical expansion is, for obvious reasons, finite; however, its potential as a cultural and educational hub may be larger, as well as its credentials as a tourist attraction and, to quote Ramsey, as “an acid dream of science fiction and archaeology,” show genuinely exciting potential. In the end, though, it is in the power of current investors to decide if the future benefits will be worth the cost, and whether NYC will get its underground park.For more information about The Lowline and supporting the project, please see The Lowline website.